Branick v. DOWNEY SAVINGS & LOAN

State Court (Pacific Reporter)4/27/2005
View on CourtListener

AI Case Brief

Generate an AI-powered case brief with:

๐Ÿ“‹Key Facts
โš–๏ธLegal Issues
๐Ÿ“šCourt Holding
๐Ÿ’กReasoning
๐ŸŽฏSignificance

Estimated cost: $0.10โ€“$0.50 per brief, depending on opinion length and retries

Full Opinion

28 Cal.Rptr.3d 2 (2005) 110 P.3d 1217

BRANICK
v.
DOWNEY SAVINGS & LOAN.

No. S132433.

Supreme Court of California.

April 27, 2005.

Petition for review granted; issues limited

Petition for review GRANTED.

The issue to be briefed and argued is limited to the following: If the standing limitations of Proposition 64 apply to actions under the Unfair Competition Law that were pending on November 3, 2004, may a plaintiff amend his or her complaint to substitute in or add a party that satisfies standing requirements of Business and Professions Code section 17204, as amended, and does such an amended complaint relate back to the initial complaint for statute of limitations purposes?

GEORGE, C.J., KENNARD, BAXTER, WERDEGAR, CHIN, BROWN, and MORENO, JJ., concur.

Case Information

Court
State Court (Pacific Reporter)
Decision Date
April 27, 2005
Citation
110 P.3d 1217
Status
Precedential
Branick v. DOWNEY SAVINGS & LOAN | Tortwell