Proctor v. Wiegold

4/27/1937
View on CourtListener

AI Case Brief

Generate an AI-powered case brief with:

๐Ÿ“‹Key Facts
โš–๏ธLegal Issues
๐Ÿ“šCourt Holding
๐Ÿ’กReasoning
๐ŸŽฏSignificance

Estimated cost: $0.10โ€“$0.50 per brief, depending on opinion length and retries

Full Opinion

To the original complaints sounding in negligence, the plaintiff seeks to add by amendment a second count. The proposed amendment prays for the setting aside of a conveyance for fraud on the plaintiff. The propriety of including such a count in this suit is questioned by the defendants. This raises an issue of law which may not be decided on a motion to amend but should be squarely raised by demurrer.

Newman vs. Golden, 108 Conn. 676, 679. Smith vs. Furness, 117 Conn. 97, 100.

The motions to amend are granted.

Case Information

Decision Date
April 27, 1937
Citation
5 Conn. Super. Ct. 73
Status
Precedential
Proctor v. Wiegold | Tortwell