Celsis in Vitro, Inc. v. CellzDirect, Inc.

U.S. Court of Appeals9/23/2010
View on CourtListener

AI Case Brief

Generate an AI-powered case brief with:

📋Key Facts
⚖️Legal Issues
📚Court Holding
💡Reasoning
🎯Significance

Estimated cost: $0.10–$0.50 per brief, depending on opinion length and retries

Full Opinion

NOTE: ThiS order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of AppeaIs
for the FederaI Circuit
CELSIS IN VITRO, INC.,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
V.
CELLZDIRECT, INC., AND _
INVITROGEN CORPORATION
Defenda,nts-Appellan,ts.
2010-1547
Appea1 from the United States DiStrict C0urt for the
Northern District of I11inois in case no. 10-CV-4053, Judge
Milt0n I. Shadur.
ON MOTION
Before PROST, C'ircuit J`udge.
0 R D E R
Cel1ZDirect, Inc. and Invitrogen Corporation (Ce11zDi-
rect) submit a motion for a stay, pending appeal, of the
preliminary injunction issued by the United States Dis-
trict Court for the N0rthern District of I11inois.
Upon consideration thereof

CELSIS IN VITRO V. CELLZDIRECT 2
IT ls ORDERED THA'r:
(1) Ce1sis In Vitro, Inc. is directed to respond no later
than October 8, 2010.
(2) The injunction is temporarily stay/ed, pending the
court's receipt of the response and the oourt's considera-
tion of the papers submitted
FOR THE COURT
 2 3 20-m fs/ Jan Horba1y _
Date J an Horba1y
C1erk
oct Jordan A. Siga1e, Esq. l
Francis M. Wikstrom, Esq. u.3. c0U¥F$§PPEAL3 FOR
THE F D LC|RCU1T
s20 `
SEP 23 2919
.lAN HORBALY
CLERK

Case Information

Court
U.S. Court of Appeals
Decision Date
September 23, 2010
Citation
664 F.3d 922
Status
Precedential
Celsis in Vitro, Inc. v. CellzDirect, Inc. | Tortwell