Bankston v. Bradley

5th Cir.12/13/2002
View on CourtListener

AI Case Brief

Generate an AI-powered case brief with:

📋Key Facts
⚖️Legal Issues
📚Court Holding
💡Reasoning
🎯Significance

Estimated cost: $0.10–$0.50 per brief, depending on opinion length and retries

Full Opinion

 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 02-60149 Conference Calendar DARRELL LYNN BANKSTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus JODY BRADLEY; ET AL., Defendants, CORRECTIONAL CORPORATION OF AMERICA (CCA), Defendant-Appellee. -------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 5:00-CV-127-BrS -------------------- December 12, 2002 Before JOLLY, JONES, and WIENER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Darrell Lynn Bankston (# R1725), who is incarcerated at Wilkinson County Correctional Facility (WCCF), appeals the grant of summary judgment to Corrections Corporation of America (CCA). Bankston’s amended complaint requested monetary damages from CCA, which operates WCCF, based on an alleged assault of Bankston by another inmate. We AFFIRM. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 02-60149 -2- As part of his claim for relief, Bankston alleged conclusionally that the assault occurred as a result of CCA’s custom or policy which allowed correctional officers to double- cell inmates whom they know to be enemies of one another. With its motion for summary judgment, CCA filed a WCCF policy statement which refuted this allegation. Bankston then failed to file a response, as required by FED. R. CIV. P. 56(e). Accordingly, the district court did not err by granting CCA’s motion for summary judgment. See Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322-26 (1986). AFFIRMED. 

Case Information

Court
5th Cir.
Decision Date
December 13, 2002
Status
Precedential
Bankston v. Bradley | Tortwell