Cecil B. Sanner and Mary W. Sanner v. The Trustees of the Sheppard and Enoch Pratt Hospital

4th Cir.12/9/1968
View on CourtListener

AI Case Brief

Generate an AI-powered case brief with:

📋Key Facts
⚖️Legal Issues
📚Court Holding
💡Reasoning
🎯Significance

Estimated cost: $0.10–$0.50 per brief, depending on opinion length and retries

Full Opinion

 PER CURIAM: Except for an important statutory relaxation 1 in 1966, Maryland judicially adheres to the so called doctrine of charitable immunity. Ordinarily such a matter is one of state law. Erie R. R. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 , 58 S.Ct. 817 , 82 L.Ed. 1188 (1938). We have carefully considered plaintiff’s interesting contention that the state of Maryland may not constitutionally cling to this judge-made, and increasingly questioned, doctrine. We reject the contention and affirm the granting of summary judgment in favor of the charitable institution, D.C., 278 F.Supp. 138 . Affirmed. 1 . Maryland Code Annotated Art. 43 §, 556A (Supp.1966). 

Case Information

Court
4th Cir.
Decision Date
December 9, 1968
Status
Precedential
Cecil B. Sanner and Mary W. Sanner v. The Trustees of the Sheppard and Enoch Pratt Hospital | Tortwell