In re Sullivan

U.S. District Court8/1/1940
View on CourtListener

AI Case Brief

Generate an AI-powered case brief with:

๐Ÿ“‹Key Facts
โš–๏ธLegal Issues
๐Ÿ“šCourt Holding
๐Ÿ’กReasoning
๐ŸŽฏSignificance

Estimated cost: $0.10โ€“$0.50 per brief, depending on opinion length and retries

Full Opinion

CLANCY, District Judge.

This motion must be denied. Under Rule 75(h) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, the District Court has the power to settle the record on appeal only when a difference arises between the parties with respect to what occurred in the District Court, so that, the record may conform to the truth. Plere the entire file was before me and was considered on the motion, the decision of which this creditor seeks to appeal. I, therefore, lack the power to exclude from the record any of the papers which bankrupt thinks should properly be in it. See Westmoreland Asbestos Co., Inc., v. Johns-Manville Corporation, D. C.S.D.N.Y., 1 F.R.D. 249. If such papers are in fact unnecessary, Rule 75(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure contemplates remedial action by the Circuit Court of Appeals.

Submit order.

Case Information

Court
U.S. District Court
Decision Date
August 1, 1940
Citation
2 F.R.D. 238
Status
Precedential
In re Sullivan | Tortwell