Lawrence, John Geddes v. State

Tex. App.10/30/2003
View on CourtListener

AI Case Brief

Generate an AI-powered case brief with:

📋Key Facts
⚖️Legal Issues
📚Court Holding
💡Reasoning
🎯Significance

Estimated cost: $0.10–$0.50 per brief, depending on opinion length and retries

Full Opinion

 Reversed and Rendered, and Memorandum Opinion on Remand filed October 30, 2003 Reversed and Rendered, and Memorandum Opinion on Remand filed October 30, 2003.   In The   Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________   NOS. 14-99-00109-CR & 14-99-00111-CR ____________   JOHN GEDDES LAWRENCE and TYRON GARNER , Appellants   V.   THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee     On Appeal from the County Criminal Court at Law No. 10 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. 98-48530 & 98-48531     M E M O R A N D U M    O P I N I O N    O N    R E M A N D    Appellants, John Geddes Lawrence and Tyron Garner, were convicted of engaging in homosexual conduct.   See Tex. Pen. Code Ann. ' 21.06 (Vernon 2003).   They were each assessed a fine of two hundred dollars.   On appeal, appellants challenged the constitutionality of section 21.06, contending it offends the equal protection and privacy guarantees assured by both the state and federal constitutions.   After hearing the case en banc, this court, in a divided opinion, rejected the constitutional arguments and affirmed the convictions.   Lawrence v. State , 41 S.W.3d 349 (Tex. App . C Houston [14th Dist.] 2001, pet. ref = d) (en banc).   The Texas Court of Criminal appeals denied appellants = petition for review, and the United States Supreme Court granted appellants = petition for writ of certiorari.   Lawrence v. Texas , 537 U.S. 1044 , 123 S. Ct. 661 (2002).   Holding   appellants = convictions under section 21.06 violate the liberty and privacy interests of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, the Supreme Court reversed the judgment of this court and remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with its opinion.   Lawrence v. Texas , ___ U.S.___, 123 S. Ct. 2472, 2476, 2484 (2003). This court is required to follow the decisions and reasoning of the United States Supreme Court on federal constitutional issues.   See Guzman v. State , 85 S.W.3d 242 , 249 n.24 (Tex. Crim . App. 2002) .   Accordingly, we reverse the judgments of the trial court, order the complaints be dismissed, and render judgments of acquittal in each cause.           /s/         John S. Anderson Justice         Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion on Remand filed October 30, 2003. Panel consists of Justices Anderson, Hudson, and Murphy. [1] Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).   [1]   Senior Chief Justice Murphy participating by assignment. 

Case Information

Court
Tex. App.
Decision Date
October 30, 2003
Status
Precedential
Lawrence, John Geddes v. State | Tortwell