AI Case Brief
Generate an AI-powered case brief with:
📋Key Facts
⚖️Legal Issues
📚Court Holding
💡Reasoning
🎯Significance
Estimated cost: $0.10–$0.50 per brief, depending on opinion length and retries
Full Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION DONNA PACCHETTI, Plaintiff, No. 18 C 5650 v. Judge Thomas M. Durkin STEAK N SHAKE OPERATIONS, INC.; STEAK ‘N SHAKE ENTERPRISES, INC.; and STEAL ‘N SHAKE, INC., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Donna Pacchetti alleges that defendant Steak ‘N Shake negligently maintained a sidewalk entry to one of its restaurants causing her to trip and fall and injure her arm. Defendants have moved for summary judgment. R. 52. That motion is granted. Legal Standard Summary judgment is appropriate “if the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a); see also Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322-23 (1986). The Court considers the entire evidentiary record and must view all of the evidence and draw all reasonable inferences from that evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmovant. Horton v. Pobjecky, 883 F.3d 941, 948 (7th Cir. 2018). To defeat summary judgment, a nonmovant must produce more than a “mere scintilla of evidence” and come forward with “specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial.” Johnson v. Advocate Health and Hosps. Corp., 892 F.3d 887, 894, 896 (7th Cir. 2018). Ultimately, summary judgment is warranted only if a reasonable jury could not return a verdict for the nonmovant. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 248 (1986). Local Rule 56.1 requires non-movants to admit or deny factual statements asserted by the movant. The factual statements and any denials must be supported with reference to the factual record. Any denials not properly supported are deemed admissions. The facts recited in the following background section are either admitted by Pacchetti or deemed admitted because Pacchetti denied them without reference to the factual record. Background On August 14, 2016, Pacchetti had lunch with a friend at a Steak N’ Shake restaurant they had been to several times before. R. 59 ¶ 8. After lunch, Pacchetti’s friend left the restaurant, and Pacchetti stayed to pay the bill. Id. ¶ 12. The exit Pacchetti used opened onto a sidewalk that paralleled the restaurant’s south wall on the left, separated by a section of landscaping filled with lava rock mulch. Id. ¶¶ 11, 13-14. The lava rock was a different color than the sidewalk. Id. ¶ 22. To the right of the sidewalk was a section of the parking lot. Id. ¶¶ 11, 13-14. As the sidewalk proceeded away from the door, it sloped down and then up again to accommodate wheelchair access from the parking lot on the right. Id. ¶¶ 11, 13-14. As the sidewalk sloped down, a curb between the sidewalk and the landscaping bed on the left remained level, such that at the sidewalk’s lowest point the curb was five inches higher than the sidewalk. See id. ¶¶ 11, 13-14; R. 31-2 at 53-55; R. 54-4 at 37-39. This curb was painted yellow. Id. ¶¶ 17, 34; R. 54-4 at 37-39. As the sidewalk sloped up again, the height of the curb decreased, and it was eventually less than an inch higher than the sidewalk. See R. 31-2 at 53-55; R. 54-4 at 37-39.1 At the corner of the building, the sidewalk turned left at a 90-degree angle around the southeast corner of the restaurant. Pacchetti’s car was parked around that corner on the east side of the restaurant. R. 59 ¶ 11. Pacchetti testified that the sidewalk was clear as she walked along it. R. 54-5 at 12 (43:3-6). Pacchetti told an investigator for Steak ‘N Shake that as she turned left heading for her car, she cut the corner and tripped over the landscaping area. R. 57 (audio recording); see also R. 59 ¶¶ 17-18, 21. A security camera recording confirms this account. R. 57 (video recording).2 Pacchetti fell, injuring her arm. Analysis Pacchetti claims “that Defendant was negligent in failing to maintain the means of ingress and egress, to and from, the restaurant in a reasonably safe condition for the use of the customers entering and exiting the restaurant.” R. 60 at 2. The duty to maintain a reasonably safe means of ingress and egress is recognized under Illinois law. See Hornacek v. 5th Avenue Prop. Mgm’t, 959 N.E.2d 173, 183 (Ill. 1 Appended to this opinion and order are photos of the curb that were exhibits for Pacchetti’s deposition. See R. 54-4 at 37-39. 2 The camera’s vantage point was around the corner on the east side of the restaurant, so the video does not clearly show how Pacchetti tripped. But the recording is consistent with her statement that she cut the corner. Additionally, Pacchetti does not dispute Defendants’ assertion that the video shows that she cut the corner of the landscaping bed. See R. 59 ¶¶ 17-18, 21. Hence, that assertion is admitted for purposes of summary judgment. App. Ct. 1st Dist. 2011). This duty is not limited to an owner of a premises, but also extends to the occupant of the premises, including Defendants in this case. See Bloom v. Bistro Rest. Ltd. P’ship, 710 N.E.2d 121, 124 (Ill. App. Ct. 1st Dist. 1999). It is undisputed that Defendants provided a sidewalk from the restaurant’s entrance to the parking lot. Pacchetti testified that this sidewalk was clear of obstacles at the time of her fall. Therefore, Defendants satisfied their duty to provide a reasonably safe means of ingress to and egress from the premises. Beyond the duty to provide a safe means of ingress and egress, Illinois law provides that a possessor of land owes its invitees a common law duty of reasonable care to maintain its premises in a reasonably safe condition. See Deibert v. Bauer Brothers Constr. Co., 566 N.E.2d 239, 437 (Ill. 1990). No duty arises, however, unless the harm is reasonably foreseeable. See Renslow v. Mennonite Hospital, 367 N.E.2d 1250, 1253 (Ill. 1977). “Whether a duty [exists] under a particular set of circumstances is a question of law for the court to decide.” Hougan v. Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc., 999 N.E.2d 792, 797 (Ill. App. Ct. 2d Dist. 2013). The duty inquiry “involves four factors: (1) the reasonable foreseeability of the injury; (2) the likelihood of the injury; (3) the magnitude of the burden of guarding against the injury; and (4) the consequences of placing the burden on the defendant.” Vancura v. Katris, 939 N.E.2d 328, 347 (Ill. 2010). Pacchetti argues that “[i]t is unreasonable to believe that people aren’t going to save a step or two by cutting across the corner to head for their cars.” R. 60 at 5. But Illinois courts disagree with this argument. See Teer v. Cole XP Schaumburg IL, LLC, 2018 WL 943282, at *9 (Ill. App. Ct. 1st Dist. Feb. 14, 2018); Rogers v. Matanda, Inc., 913 N.E.2d 15, 19 (Ill. App. Ct. 3d Dist. 2009); Seipp v. Chi. Trans. Auth., 299 N.E.2d 330, 334 (Ill. App. Ct. 1st Dist. 1973). These courts have held that when a property owner provided a safe path of ingress and egress, and the plaintiff decided to leave that path, the property owner was not liable for other dangers on the property. These cases dictate the outcome here. Moreover, even if Defendants should have known that people would cut the corner, and assuming that the landscaping conditions can be characterized as dangerous, the undisputed facts show that Defendants adequately warned pedestrians of this alleged danger. The curb was painted yellow and the mulch was a different color from the sidewalk, both serving to highlight the different surfaces. To require anything more from Defendants would effectively prohibit them from maintaining a landscape bed next to a sidewalk. Defendants are entitled to rely on a pedestrian’s ability to recognize the presence of a curb and a landscape bed and to understand that a landscape bed is not as stable a walking surface as a sidewalk. At bottom, none of the conditions Pacchetti encountered outside the restaurant was unusual, let alone dangerous. Defendants provided a clear sidewalk, bordered by curbs and landscaping, which are very common conditions pedestrians regularly confront. Pacchetti chose to walk across a curb and through the landscaping. That was her fault, not Defendants’. Conclusion Therefore, Defendant’s motion for summary judgment [52] is granted. ENTERED: Ah ontts Bucher. Honorable Thomas M. Durkin United States District Judge Dated: December 17, 2020 ae a ee te aT — hte □ a 7 q r = □ ee | Pa | | □□□ Trey ees Fs. a ae re i □ Faia | be □□ ‘ al a Si eee lal al □ i a a \ La) ve □ a 4 im ball i a. iS □ a ian = ee □ ba □□ ‘4 reat 3 (oli Sa TS eee a ae eee eeeeeeil'2* = +h nh Lo 1 , cI CS —— ipehebak} Pe ae Peas err Mier □□ [eit Shaiig ny (ane NEB at Nis! = fee DISET fe ane “ yf ELS 7 mp + see! J) = ee nT aR Lt rrr EES Lee □□□ a, r \ eed) toe ae at Wty ae ee aes Te | - Sy aa eee aere □□□ nee eR aa pe ae! ras) Teale tee hua coe ae os ES et pies hoi Sa Seinppesne otis! Hirano 2 a Toe se aoa So Fe. ee PORES WY aa RSS ES 2 HA ORE Neat, Pe pated faye cuenta Mae : re Cis Le aoe ee et Shep tet haba baat Rita □□□ ae Raye . (oe a pyets ae epee he arih per Liuislu eater oa. ok” %, Ce : Set i tapes sh) Bora a esac RAN ene ue. ail Se LG ea Fore i es Wo tien ds er irc ey ‘nape oe 2 Figgas) GA nee Faria = Rost lina ie RY, pe Been BR ag ce Nie te : > =a Sp ES ae ees i) veya i oe gg Yee ea Eee ro. a a be □ tk □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□ meen Se ts a2 eo ee NEY ae Unis isa a ass se □□ iaer ute ee Se POST Steet Bs hes Shree ee non Easy [peat fest i Mey Ende yas; jiogl eae beer eng a Soho MH eis □ □□ □□ □□ □□□ Bh Fics Myers cress ern □□ Bar oe hie fad ea eae RSG es ope pe aie brs paar ik gl frig sale ag □□□□□□ □□□ □□ □□□ aeae aah Brite ni i Biter arto Pay GAS Ree TRAN aS Dens pte rast Sirsa See □□□ ARR Y a (asa Ger fe RoW Bee eae co CN ope Rtg KG ete Reece strat □□□ □□ A RRA EEN I ope Verda □□ AL SN nae le ial Tee cy ete 3 foe Teed sa ap ale Lerten eA et crate ite Mate cia Bee eS nk ator Gove □□□□□ □□□ □□ □□ ba NS ad MALE 5 Dah a gt Boa CLEC a ate |: Se fork eee a Rosy □□□ Te teed Deel. tales! beer, rani epee Sy as Frift. 2 day □□□ □□□□ □□□ ree aaa? era □□□ □□ SS tit ype nce Pili ie teee mG sits a Ren ets sexo eae mika np pre th a Banat □□□□□ te Las Sac Wie be har vanpicaoetin. Biers □□ torn tong ea epee pea bakee ly Bik tech erie Be Pete ert ecceoe ns Aaa: ENSUED Chips Marte □□ □□□ □□ et □□□ eases Br ere Sten ryan oa E rene uit) the oad fae parapet U0 □□□ □□□□ en □□ nea SE Og □□ ete ae eeriyg (teen STL Es Fiat bent aX hrs rect rae San ae mans eal eee et ae at □□□□ a □□□ est | Sy ee te hr Etat boatincie es Te ates nro SS 3 4 □□□ Ae so Ry health set AWN ten tel. epee □□□ □□ □ □□□□□ □□□□ PRE iy Ree acoA Mette eee ee re peat) Ae □□□ eae eee ee ise SHAH ea □□□ □□ □□□ □□□ piety □□ aH ann Th eo Feseea ys Sieee A ead Sardis tear ce 27(eeRAN St OO SeeMeutetuk abtinejeaT he aa eeaghiip het □□□□ □□ □□□□ □□□□ Ne A ec Pe OM NLS SDT Te pete Wah Pl can a E wi pet, Maia ECE? nro” + a Phat □ rine aye eT ta ig ete ee eh bl □□□ □□ □ □□□ □□ a one cha TG ster SP Ne cee ane PbS. Bethe BSAA Mar teal ry □ boar Vp) i oh ae a eee □□□ ieee br cies et rah, eo □□□ = Petey eee a ae Haan ed eld Beir eat Heirs ct es Bh A Ny tReet Pe ATs □□□□ □□ □□□□□ Gee ts Stn pene Seat A MMe Pee State NM ih ee ha Bee elgg ere lt os) aN ie Spa eee eA NERDY nie. teen □ □ | TERS eh aR ME MOM EL MY eed aL NO Velie AHR aba aoe Te □ == ae □□ Pie □□□ □□□ a ROO □ ee a. = □□ SSoeare =i ieee □□ ee = aa □□ ‘coeee ree wea an ane ee ss re ET ae □□ □ | = ; Sa □□□□□ | : c(— a □□□□ a ee ree □ □ i ee eta tie ee Sour ew cea i, : ay Rie ae a □□□ | ai 5 : mt ee □□ eeeeees □□□□□□ a Z| = tag ee See as r my □□ mage efi besa □□ □□ □□□ □□□ : yg □□ aes □ = □□□ 7 na ; . 5 pe “ey Saris □□□ i = Sy ay ee aig □□ □□ □□□ Pa ry : Ta irae ‘+ FSCO es □□ as a. ie Te ag Sessa □□ □□□□ □□ □□□□□ Ae gat SS ee eae □□ Beso Meas 2 □□□ □□□ J □□□ Wz ane ne erie Shee a x ok □□ □□ = So pa Perey ea □□□ Ma . Ss ecto ang oot ai oe ees ag lee □□□ □ ar et a iS Ma am ee OS La □□ □□□ Bek Oe Wiens bas pon none See a □□□ □□ Bayt ae Hp AD eae pce rade, □□□□□ □ □□ rs _ aioe Set ee ana cepa Fee □□ : Betzee See Ss jibe □□□□ : Pe 3 oe See percent a \ nah a pas aes Siege Se cosas □□ □ oe ae SSS Cea a ae ae ee □□□ □□ eT as Siepanise® ras ew □□□ at aR ais ee i or eecey □□ Toe ee =O» petra vet ome i aati ata □□□□ □ 4 □□ Ae Fis aaa ot mE ere Tihs wee na wes xb: beet □□□ Or -_ Che en fel a hea tte remy Se Ee tyes Daca □□ □□□ □ a0" Sie hye sete pa a | es □□□ hep be Nee Fuse eye □□□□ □□ = DS Petey ie. abe ei eee ay rte Wee bee Ee We Spe ra □□ □□ errs □□□ Ree Wek cua AE A an BSNL bere eu Rae □□□ □□□ □□ tp □□□ tH res ob Ue Pains na rate bane i ea Senet ey Wes ices □□□ Healt Sera Aieeee Ss OFA al Ree ees SSSA ras Renee Be TROT □□□ □□□ □□□ aA peas ea ed Hees i Grea a □□□ sigh Tat a imaites en Se ae een oo eee □□□□□□ ie ides a BDH See eee AUT eye i BK ei □ as eek a ws oe Wa oS eps an □□□ i A ate teen toe re. Pana Nasi Relate tay Urea BS Dee □□□ ee =e cay □□ □□□ □□ TST ee “ ane i PHS Le hg eS PA rare ~eutt Winner area ety ah ah te ges □□ □□ □□□□□ oe a: caper ONtnea Srerkita yaad □□ HN nia cites pre kat Sor iat taste BES ies □□ □□□ 2 be Batis. istis Sr iaugaacele Hert EAT AS am) sano aie bis a yy a ies tepeS □□□ □□□ □□□ areal Breet, ag, Sane ciNy cS PavaeR raph a Raina acute esas i oy ea Reds □□ □□ Peal My see Deaphia ens □□ Boast eatin Ee ea wie Eeaeeese Ae Cee, beste Bites □ □□ □□□ ee Sth age Sehr ee Bethany : inet Pas Gealiehs ers A Wie ON tent □□□ □ □□ □□□ □□□ sales Leia ts ty ani at □□ ee uefa Sienna: Bere Fee □□□ □□ □□ arity rH aioe t si cern ae Ssreits Ae LL ay ea cai tase aes a fot Peta a He 7! A A a □□□ □□□□ Bape 5 Reon pha aaa cats PROVE, □□□ Eh ee □□□ covets AW ay Gea □□ □□□ □□□□ cape Piles aa Ae ae epee I st aa Si pears □□ □□□□□ erate Sohn ent RA ula Hoss ei ae Ne MOR ey: Rupe fe RAB ci a7 eal Ate Bea) Agri □□ □□□ □□□ ee oe Saatchi He ee ee ) ee Bok ae □□□ ter- ep mL, wit oats ote le ie pie Png Sita yeet SiS yes ety Ulery, eM Wes Wee Bei Bets Bae □□ □□ ipo eect Preis ais 2 eet BARES ie etal SRE ta ent tS Libs ia □□□ Se} □□□□ □□□ □□□□ eG ie aa Pasta eth Bsns Wen eters, HY Or oo: ots □□□□□□ eben a ae cn ee Noe Ce Aen io i Ly □□ □□□ □□ ees pica ait sa ees net sata te pelt ta) tc ED At pee 2 Cal ike Baie is ae Pia □□□ □ □□□□ □□ mare Seem aes teers CSR Mace tise abs etc eh etanieans Nit Ve Sea □□□ Treag) Bact “neh □□□ □□□ □□□□ ee a Hae Reel bay sands □□□ Da. See Was ms ee □□ □□ eae! iat: Ses EL Raat Saat cele a aiiBiaeen Psst Uy Be yk aoe ie eee □□ Gut ay) Hic eds ithe toy SNS) vs ES Se eG cere eal, □□ Rina ae ma Pt a Tioepeney ee Ry AC at Bas □□ □□ □□□ □□□ tee iguiton Mit feat reAtiEs naa ie) a Yet a of Sia NT AN pars Sok bedee er a □□□□ □□□ □□□ oye ails Aaa ES amen Videhties DivaaNie mie rote Near Aroune i gee □□ CEA □□ Satie ae it aetna. yen Ne Beatiittd een eee Nearing AS aes Se es), pais □□□□□ □□ eae ey □□□ ae cas ae Ris Nis Beith ey □□ dee) Siiees Chea □□ asp ttaieg eae Coke AMR Ble bet Se □□□□ Beer es vbnpeae □□ egee anos aire celeb SEN BAN aun as Maoh a renete □□□ 5 Se □□□□□ mney SEN ht by Ney etal Bree es rie pees □□□ eae reat = et hes Raac ih) □□ □□ □□□□□ □□□ i ee ee eat es Bes ae l say meats Ris ie Ree Naaneicet rae eis Re. eS Hae eae, □□□□ sintes areas Ge eee ee aon ane Nepean eae As Lee, □□ □□ yt tie culos Aa eat ent a ie 4 a Sat Bec □□□□ Baie ra lnc Seiad ea Hi Paha □□ ce eee a ae Sanity iS ae) ye □□□ yee Seat: AMCs aan Lo adi Bees Dee Se apt HN os pea Bnei ie Rep □□ ae ape: ae REE Dienst: th Raa taken Rte eee □□□ Rte Moe) SAO BAe □□□ □□ reat Prot A ey aa pea See cae cones) ‘eee Ai PS □□□□□ □□□□□ Pane. rete ence aera 8 Say is FesN CAS BS rave Fd Sets 2a ea Besta Saas OPES ete aS Beet ties gle Se frat en ey Ra onea beads eer Ete. ee. Sos he mt □□□ gn i □□ □□ sates, Se NA MBean eet wee i uaa □□□□□ een Ne USSR □□□ □□□ Lies rast saleg ee it esis iti MS tere Ses ieenety EX □ Sate Soni Gabe eta cee OR SEO a Jl Aes TRS ie), eter 2 □□ , Seas Pai gees ue thes ah ee ly ee shen erd. er em Ate eter tet in □□ By pores}: ath = Paiute cat ts Pah Llp Peep rayt mah Bsa rn Fen a ey = Pate, rte 13 Pa hte □□ ey Maree, 5 . □□□ □□□ epi Seer ees Ir AS) ea oe. □□ sh eh Nees ele Fly olith A aN Te cine hres nes ahs 2 Che LAN esa eae ® □□□ □ ee eget Fy tie Ne ol aie Sipe ad ease oe Gee seeAy Beart □□ sto ame ti □□□ } pace Be ela □□ eee (i Beeler neGy □□□ boas Ut Bites 3) Dei va een rr! wt Uf a ries iT □□□ Wee rie □□ iayars a ee cue Note a eRe Be 5 =e \ ia peallten ira ih Riche yitan Need Set ees Deed 1 Pe ota GN eis! Bom a y [es Ue esa oe ae eae Bey ace Sees Bah per tt be [ee Peat ity eee Rem les fern eid ean e pDey □□ et ieee ben Wi i a Sek Rage eae ee, Grr eetht mee aie Re aA aaa te pe cE SEES par oe pea eh ti ESE: eee : oe oe S ets saa TPA Bo Nt ratio > oer UT ny □□□ eae ahi ay Ueki erednsemiesyt betel esol Te epee By ed ee,
Case Information
- Court
- N.D. Ill.
- Decision Date
- December 17, 2020
- Status
- Precedential