United States v. Glenn W. Lucas

D.C. Cir.4/8/1970
View on CourtListener

AI Case Brief

Generate an AI-powered case brief with:

đź“‹Key Facts
⚖️Legal Issues
📚Court Holding
đź’ˇReasoning
🎯Significance

Estimated cost: $0.10–$0.50 per brief, depending on opinion length and retries

Full Opinion

PER CURIAM:
Appellant was convicted of second degree burglary, 22 D.C.Code § 1801(b) (Supp. II 1969), and grand larceny, 22 D.C.Code § 2201 (1967). Although he raises several points on appeal, we deem it necessary to comment on only one.
Appellant challenges the trial court’s ruling permitting him to be impeached by prior convictions of unauthorized use of a vehicle and petit larceny on the ground that the former has no bearing on credibility and the latter was similar to the offense of grand larceny for which he was on trial.
We agree that under our opinion in United States v. Carr,
135 U.S.App.D.C. 348
,
418 F.2d 1184
(1969), the offense of taking property without right, 22
D.C. Code § 1201
(1967), does not bear on credibility and that in essence unauthorized use of a vehicle is a similar offense. We agree, too, that Gordon v. United States,
127 U.S.App.D.C. 343
,
383 F.2d 936
(1967), cert. denied,
390 U.S. 1029
,
88 S.Ct. 1421
,
20 L.Ed.2d 287
(1968), precludes the use of the same or similar offenses for impeachment unless they “directly relat[e] to veracity.” 127 U.S.App.D.C. at 347,
383 F.2d at 940
. The difficulty with appellant’s position as to both of his prior convictions is that they were introduced in evidence on his own direct examination in an effort to support his contention that he was framed in the instant case by one of the Government’s witnesses. Under the circumstances, he has no cause to complain.
Affirmed.
Circuit Judge ROBB concurs in the result.

Case Information

Court
D.C. Cir.
Decision Date
April 8, 1970
Status
Precedential