AI Case Brief
Generate an AI-powered case brief with:
📋Key Facts
⚖️Legal Issues
📚Court Holding
💡Reasoning
🎯Significance
Estimated cost: $0.10–$0.50 per brief, depending on opinion length and retries
Full Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-41448
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
BARRY WAYNE GUY,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. C-99-CR-226-1
--------------------
October 23, 2000
Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Barry Wayne Guy (“Guy”)
on appeal has requested leave to withdraw as counsel and filed a
brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Guy filed a response. Pursuant this court’s order, counsel filed
a supplemental letter brief. Guy filed a response to this brief
as well.
Our independent review of the briefs, responses, and the
record discloses no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, the motion
for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 99-41448
-2-
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th
Cir. R. 42.2.
Case Information
- Court
- State Court (Southern Reporter)
- Decision Date
- October 24, 2000
- Citation
- 736 So. 2d 1042 (1999)
- Status
- Precedential